ConfOrganizer 

  Abstract |    Highlights |    References | 

---

Paper Highlights

• بررسی اثرات آلیاژ حافظه دار بر رفتار لرزه ای پل بتنی عرشه جعبه ای
• مقایسه پاسخ ها در دو حالت برای دریفت بیشینه و پسماند
• مدل سازی غیرخطی سازه
• اعمال تعداد زیادی رکورد زلزله واقعی به منظور لحاظ نمودن اثرات عدم قطعیت زلزله

---

Paper References

• 1. DesRoches, R. & Delemont, M. (2002). Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using shape memory alloys. Engineering Structuers,
• 2. Billah, M., & Alam, M. S. (2013). Seismic vulnerability assessment of SMA reinforced concrete bridge bents under near fault ground motions. In: Second Conference on Smart Monitoring, Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures, Sep., British Columbia University, Kelowna, Canada.
• 3. Shrestha, B. & Hao. H. (2015). Parametric study of seismic performance of super-elastic shape memory alloy-reinforced bridge piers. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-cycle Design and Performance.
• 4. Zheng, Y., Dong, Y. & Li. (2018). Resilience and life-cycle performance of smart bridges with shape memory alloy (SMA)-cable-based bearings. Construction and Building Materials, 158, 389-400.
• 5. Billah, A.H.M. M. & Alam, M. S. (2018). Probabilistic seismic risk assessment of concrete bridge piers reinforced with different types of shape memory alloys. Engineering Structures, 162, 97-108.
• 6. Paulay T, Priestley MNJ. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc.; 1992.
• 8. Nielson, B. (2005). "Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones," Dissertation, Georgia Institue of Technology.
• 7. Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., and Foutch, D. A. (2002). "Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines." Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(4), 526-533.

  Abstract |    Highlights |    References | 

---

Paper Highlights

• Collapse of structures is one of the main concerns in the existing and designed buildings which are existent in seismic zones.
• This study evaluates the performance of intermediate moment-resisting reinforced concrete structures that are designed according to Iranian seismic code (standard No. 2800) in order to meet the collapse.
• To this aim, five intermediate moment-resisting reinforced concrete structures of 3, 5, 8, 10 and 15-storey (three-span) are designed. IDA and DCFD method based on NI were used to evaluate the performance of CP level.
• Results show that probabilistic demand (PD) of structures increases with height of the structures so that its value is larger than the capacity factored for 15-storey structure.

---

Paper References

• F. Jalayer, C.A. Cornell, A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor (DCFD) seismic formats., Report No. RMS-43, Stanford University, 2003.
• SAC Joint Venture. (2000a). Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment frame buildings, Rep. No. FEMA-350, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
• Building & Housing Research Center, BHRC (2015). Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings, Standard No. 2800, Publication PNS-253, 4rd Revision, 240, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).
• Reinhorn, A.M., Kunnath, S.K., Valles-Mattox, R. (2009). IDARC2D Version 7.0: A computer program for the inelastic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings, State University of New York at Buffalo.
• Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491-514.‏