ConfOrganizer 

  Abstract | 

  Abstract |    Highlights |    References | 

---

Paper Highlights

• بررسی اثرات آلیاژ حافظه دار بر رفتار لرزه ای پل بتنی عرشه جعبه ای
• مقایسه پاسخ ها در دو حالت برای دریفت بیشینه و پسماند
• مدل سازی غیرخطی سازه
• اعمال تعداد زیادی رکورد زلزله واقعی به منظور لحاظ نمودن اثرات عدم قطعیت زلزله

---

Paper References

• 1. DesRoches, R. & Delemont, M. (2002). Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using shape memory alloys. Engineering Structuers,
• 2. Billah, M., & Alam, M. S. (2013). Seismic vulnerability assessment of SMA reinforced concrete bridge bents under near fault ground motions. In: Second Conference on Smart Monitoring, Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures, Sep., British Columbia University, Kelowna, Canada.
• 3. Shrestha, B. & Hao. H. (2015). Parametric study of seismic performance of super-elastic shape memory alloy-reinforced bridge piers. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-cycle Design and Performance.
• 4. Zheng, Y., Dong, Y. & Li. (2018). Resilience and life-cycle performance of smart bridges with shape memory alloy (SMA)-cable-based bearings. Construction and Building Materials, 158, 389-400.
• 5. Billah, A.H.M. M. & Alam, M. S. (2018). Probabilistic seismic risk assessment of concrete bridge piers reinforced with different types of shape memory alloys. Engineering Structures, 162, 97-108.
• 6. Paulay T, Priestley MNJ. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc.; 1992.
• 8. Nielson, B. (2005). "Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones," Dissertation, Georgia Institue of Technology.
• 7. Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., and Foutch, D. A. (2002). "Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines." Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(4), 526-533.

  Abstract |    Highlights |    References | 

---

Paper Highlights

• در این مطالعه، به کمک روش تحلیل حساسیت مبتنی بر تجزیه واریانس، سهم هر یک از پارامترهای لرزه‌خیزی ورودی تحلیل خطر احتمالاتی زمین‌لرزه بر ایجاد تغییرپذیری در نتایج تفکیک خطر مورد آزمون قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که پارامتر لرزه‌خیزی شیب رابطه گوتنبرگ-ریشتر ب

---

Paper References

• Bommer, J.J. and Acevedo, A.B., (2004), “The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(1), pp 43-91.
• Bazzurro, P. and Allin Cornell, C., (1999), “Disaggregation of seismic hazard,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 89(2), pp 501-520.
• Kowsari, M., Eftekhari, N., Kijko, A., Dadras, E. Y., Ghazi, H., & Shabani, E. (2019), “Quantifying seismicity parameter uncertainties and their effects on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: a case study of Iran,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, 176(4), pp 1487-1502.
• Saltelli, A., K. Chan, and Scott, E.M., (2004), “Sensitivity analysis,” New York: John Wiley and Sons: Wiley series in probability and statistics, 475.
• Cornell, C.A., (1968), “ Engineering seismic risk analysis,” Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 58(5), pp 1583-1606.
• Gutenburg, B., and Richter, C. F., (1941), “ Seismicity of the Earth,” Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap, 34.
• Vallina, U. A., and Rodríguez, J. M., (1986), “ Fundamentos de geofísica,” Editorial Alhambra SA. España.
• Kijko, A., & Sellevoll, M. A., (1990), “ Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters for incomplete and uncertain data files,” Natural Hazards, 3(1), pp 1-13.
• Yadav, A. K., (2016), “Long-term earthquake forecasting model for northeast India and surrounding region: seismicity-based model,” Natural Hazards, 80(1), pp 173-190.
• Sobol', I.y.M., (1990), “On sensitivity estimation for nonlinear mathematical models,” Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie. 2(1), pp 112-118.
• Yazdani, A., et al., (2014), “An artificial statistical method to estimate seismicity parameter from incomplete earthquake catalogs, a case study in metropolitan Tehran, Iran,” Scientia Iranica.
• Kowsari, M., Halldorsson, B., Eftekhari, N., & Saabjornsson, J. (2018), “Sensitivity analysis of earthquake hazard in husavik, north Iceland from variable seismicity and ground motion models,” 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16ECEE), Thessaloniki, Greece.
• . Beauval, C. and Scotti, O., (2004), “Quantifying sensitivities of PSHA for France to earthquake catalog uncertainties, truncation of ground-motion variability, and magnitude limits,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94(5), pp 1579-1594.
• Gholipour, Y., et al., (2008), “Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, phase I–greater Tehran regions,” Final report. Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran.

  Abstract |    Highlights |    References | 

---

Paper Highlights

• بررسی رفتار لرزه ای پل های بتنی با عرشه جعبه ای با لحاظ کردن رفتار غیرخطی اجزاء و اثرات اندرکنش خاک و سازه
• تحلیل حساسیت پاسخ لرزه ای پل به تعداد قابل توجهی از پارامترهای هندسی و مکانیکی
• تشخیص پارامترهای اثرگذارتر بر پاسخ لرزه ای غیرخطی پل بتنی و ارائه توصیه هایی جهت افزایش قابلیت اعتماد در فرآیند آنالیز، طراحی و ساخت این نوع از پل ها

---

Paper References

• Homma, T., Saltelli, A., (1996), “Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models”, Reliab Eng Syst Saf; 52, pp 1–17.
• Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M., (2004) “Sensitivity analysis in practice: a guide to assessing scientific models”, John Wiley & Sons.
• Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W., (1949), “The Mathematical Theory of Information”, University of Illinois Press.
• Krzykacz-Hausmann, B., (2001), “Epistemic sensitivity analysis based on the concept of entropy”, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Sensit. Anal. Model Output, Madrid, Spain, June 18-20, pp 31–5.
• Beirlant, J., Devroye, L., Györfi, L., Vajda, I., (2001) “Large deviations of divergence measures on partitions”, J Stat Plan Inference, 93, pp 1–16.
• Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H. and Fenves, G. L., (2006) “The open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSEES) user command-language manual,”.
• Choi, E., (2002), “Seismic analysis and retrofit of mid-America bridges", (Doctoral dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology).
• Ellingwood, B., Hwang, H., (1985), “Probabilistic descriptions of resistance of safety-related structures in nuclear plants”, Nucl Eng Des;88, pp 169–78.
• Ramanathan, K.N., (2012), “Next generation seismic fragility curves for California bridges incorporating the evolution in seismic design philosophy”, Georgia Institute of Technology.
• Bavirisetty, R., Vinayagamoorthy, M., Duan, L., (2000), “Dynamic analysis. In Bridge engineering (pp 85-119), CRC Press.
• Caltrans, (2007), “Reinforced concrete bridge capacity assessment training manual”, Report Submitted to Structure Maintenance and Investigations, Sacramento, CA.

  Abstract |    References | 

---

Paper References

• Bray, J.D. and Rodriguez-Marek, A., (2004), “Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region,” Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 24(11), pp 815-828.
• Shahi, S.K. and Baker, J.W., (2011), “An empirically calibrated framework for including the effects of near-fault directivity in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(2), pp 742-755.
• Gholipour, Y., Bozorgnia, Y., Rahnama, M., Berberian, M. and Shojataheri, J., (2008), “Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis, Phase I-Greater Tehran Regions,” Final Report, 1.